September 11, 2012 - J

[7:15 ; I arrive] - J is already in
[7:30ish-8:20 ; I am not in the department to observe]
Note 1 level est. @ 80%
[9:37-9:47 ; bathroom, I am not in the department to observe]
10:05-10:23 ; wandering
10:23-10:38+ ; phone
Note 1 level est. @ 70% ; (see NOTE 2)
[11:24-11:54 ; lunch, I am not in the department to observe]
? -12:04 ; phone
Note 1 level est. @ 90%
[12:48-12:58 ; I am not in the department to observe]
? -1:13 ; wandering
1:13-1:14 ; phone
1:14-1:34 ; wandering
1:34-1:39 ; yakking
1:39-1:43 ; sitting, phone
(1:42-1:52 ; management in area)
1:53-2:16 ; sitting, phone, yakking
(2:16-2:18 ; management in department
2:20 ; working! see NOTE 3
2:23-2:38 ; sitting, phone
(2:38 ; management in area)
2:39-2:52 ; wandering
[2:42-2:45 ; I am not in the department to observe]
2:45ish ; 2nd shift arrives
2:57-2::58 ; see NOTE 4
+3:15-3:18 ; wandering
Note 1 level est. @ 70%
[3:49 ; I leave the building}


If the terms used seem confusing, you might read this.


NOTE 1: Of late, J has begun to... not work more, but goof off smarter. He alternates between working and not, so that it becomes difficult to track him unless you watch him at all times. He's not goofing off non-stop, but he's not really working, either. I've tried to estimate malingering level between notable events using a percentage scale, but I'm not terribly happy with this system.

NOTE 2: The company VP was in the area sometime between 10:23 and 11:24 (I did not note the exact time), but still J continued to mess with his phone, which is a VP-directed no-no.

NOTE 3: Not sure (not noted, dont remember) whether it was before or after 2:20, but a piece of work sat on the machine for a half an hour after it was finished before J did anything with it.

NOTE 4: J did not approve of the pallet jack in our department, so he spent the time to swap it with another.